29 Feb 2008
Offtopic: Is there any possibility that Virendra Dev Dixit, and even the alleged soul of Krishna/Lekhraj Kirpalani, is playing "good politics" between the two organisations, e.g. saying or not saying stuff so as to not upset the apple cart too much?
I don't accept that Lekhraj Kirpalani was in 100% God consciousness at all times, nor even under 100% possession. Logically, he was not even from a BK point of view because he was not perfect. So there have to be degrees of purity in his words. It was often very clear in the Sakars when he was chipping in with something.
I don't think that Virendra Dev Dixit or the PBKs can say this because it would only increase the tensions between them and the BKs. I think that Virendra Dev Dixit and the PBKs have to say things to appeal to the BK programming in individuals. That he has invested more efforts that anyone else to make sense of scrambled egg that is the Murli and Bhog messages.
If the "truth" strayed too far, then they would lose their customer base ... like the Vishnu Party. We need some fixed deadlines after which we can surely say, "Well, that was all bollocks then, wasn't it? Then move on". But I suspect that like Nostradamus, Edgar Casey et al, it will continue to dribble on and be re-interpreted for ages. Could it all do some good? Yes, if they started putting their super white saris and guddhis aside and did more genuine charity work.
Many of the Bhog messages are hugely unreliable to the point of farce sometimes ... but I heard that they changed the system now to put a stop to it. So what is the advanced understanding of Dadi Pee taking the role as a "son", what is the significance of the sex?