09 Jun 2008
In a way, the Brahma Kumaris have to accept being the 'Mother of all Doomsday Cults" - on the basis of their philosophy which implicates that all "Doomsday Cults" are imperfect and incomplete "memorials" of them from last Cycle of Time. They are the only one true "Doomsday Cult". Its logically inescapable.
But Paul raises some interesting questions; at what point does one "become a Brahma Kumari" ... especially now, given that Doomsday, "Destruction", is buried away in a course, after a course, after a course? Is one socially and psychically inducted BEFORE one know the big picture or can one only be considered a BK AFTER one is given the big picture and accepts in. In the old days, and still in India, there were surrendering ceremonies, signed 'letters of faith', may saw that only when you got your BK ring you were "married" to the spirit entity BapDada.
I am not comfortable using this c-word as a strategy because it is too easily defeated and, as we saw with the recent Police/State action, becoming politicised. But "cultic" is accurate and academic. There are distinctly cultic aspects to the Brahma Kumaris centered around the secrecy of the teachings, the leadership's personality and the unaccountable, power structure.
But even once "in", and after surrendering or signing one's soul away, how many BKs really, honestly believe in 5,000 years Cycles and Destruction? Not the full 100% I would say. We were lead to believe by the leadership that they are toning down "Destruction" and it was becoming "Transformation", oh how nice, but the recent reform documents saw them asking whether they should be more outfront about "the changes" that were coming.
But, yes, I think it is a good thing for newcomers to know exactly what lies in the heart of the BKs BEFORE they are inducted. Over to you ... BKs.