The Spiritual Bypass.
I don't know how widely this term is used beyond California, so forgive me if I am stating the obvious. Psychospiritual and therapeutic practitioners here use it to describe the phenomenon amongst some New Age and spiritual followers - once an experience of peace or bliss has been tasted in meditation, people can develop a tendency to take refuge in that experience as a way of avoiding, or bypassing, arising emotions that are perceived as "unspiritual."
Like many Anglo-Saxons, I was not raised to express or discuss emotions, so it was an automatic response for me to adopt the spiritual bypass within my BK world. I certainly got the message that anger, depression, or even joy as a response to worldly things, were wrong and signs of failure. I thought I was succeeding if I could bypass these emotions, and I was totally complicit in discounting or judging issues within my BK environment that had an emotional root.
It was several years before I began to see the potential for personal harm and institutional abuse in this position. Just to share one example, I witnessed some extreme psychological abuse of three young Brothers at the hands of a center-in-charge, who I now consider a pathological bully and an egomaniac. The abuse was bad enough, (and I confess that I was too much of the "insider mindset" to speak out or act) but I got very concerned about the seeming complete lack of permission for those victims to speak up, or to express their emotional reality about it later. (I sincerely hope they found their way to recovery from that experience).
I am interested in this again now in the light of today's emerging spiritual teachers - Eckhart Tolle, Arjuna Ardagh, Byron Katie, Adyashanti, Gangaji, and many others I am sure. Their message seems to be the opposite: when any problematic emotion arises (and that can be a positive emotion in an inappropriate situation), move your focus into the center of it, experience the energetic and visceral reality of it, without any thought, story, movement toward or away.
If you completely drop all stories about why you are angry, say, and drop all impetus to act on or react to the anger, then (to quote the Murli), you will discover that it is just a paper tiger. You will discover an infinite realm of presence, silence, and love (or whatever) on the other side. I remember BK Denise giving a class on this once in London. And I remember being totally confused by it because it seemed so contrary to my understanding, and far too dangerous to contemplate.
As I explore these teachers and practice their very simple message, which is the direct opposite of the spiritual bypass, I am beginning to discover the truth in what Byron Katie says, "Life is internal ... There is no way my life cannot be a mirror image of my thinking. There is nothing out there but my thinking."
This brings me back to the Murli! I don't remember whether it was in Sakar or Avyakt Murlis, but I do remember Baba saying occasionally that the world is nothing but a dream, in other words nothing but a projection of thought. It makes me wonder if I am coming full circle now and seeing that there is more depth to the Murlis than I thought at the time, and if that depth can be arrived at from the opposite direction.
I am sure this kind of thing has been discussed on here before, but I'd be very interested to read comments and views from others if you can bear to go over it again.
I don't know how widely this term is used beyond California, so forgive me if I am stating the obvious. Psychospiritual and therapeutic practitioners here use it to describe the phenomenon amongst some New Age and spiritual followers - once an experience of peace or bliss has been tasted in meditation, people can develop a tendency to take refuge in that experience as a way of avoiding, or bypassing, arising emotions that are perceived as "unspiritual."
Like many Anglo-Saxons, I was not raised to express or discuss emotions, so it was an automatic response for me to adopt the spiritual bypass within my BK world. I certainly got the message that anger, depression, or even joy as a response to worldly things, were wrong and signs of failure. I thought I was succeeding if I could bypass these emotions, and I was totally complicit in discounting or judging issues within my BK environment that had an emotional root.
It was several years before I began to see the potential for personal harm and institutional abuse in this position. Just to share one example, I witnessed some extreme psychological abuse of three young Brothers at the hands of a center-in-charge, who I now consider a pathological bully and an egomaniac. The abuse was bad enough, (and I confess that I was too much of the "insider mindset" to speak out or act) but I got very concerned about the seeming complete lack of permission for those victims to speak up, or to express their emotional reality about it later. (I sincerely hope they found their way to recovery from that experience).
I am interested in this again now in the light of today's emerging spiritual teachers - Eckhart Tolle, Arjuna Ardagh, Byron Katie, Adyashanti, Gangaji, and many others I am sure. Their message seems to be the opposite: when any problematic emotion arises (and that can be a positive emotion in an inappropriate situation), move your focus into the center of it, experience the energetic and visceral reality of it, without any thought, story, movement toward or away.
If you completely drop all stories about why you are angry, say, and drop all impetus to act on or react to the anger, then (to quote the Murli), you will discover that it is just a paper tiger. You will discover an infinite realm of presence, silence, and love (or whatever) on the other side. I remember BK Denise giving a class on this once in London. And I remember being totally confused by it because it seemed so contrary to my understanding, and far too dangerous to contemplate.
As I explore these teachers and practice their very simple message, which is the direct opposite of the spiritual bypass, I am beginning to discover the truth in what Byron Katie says, "Life is internal ... There is no way my life cannot be a mirror image of my thinking. There is nothing out there but my thinking."
This brings me back to the Murli! I don't remember whether it was in Sakar or Avyakt Murlis, but I do remember Baba saying occasionally that the world is nothing but a dream, in other words nothing but a projection of thought. It makes me wonder if I am coming full circle now and seeing that there is more depth to the Murlis than I thought at the time, and if that depth can be arrived at from the opposite direction.
I am sure this kind of thing has been discussed on here before, but I'd be very interested to read comments and views from others if you can bear to go over it again.