The BKWSU is not only dedicated to "Godly education" but claims clearly and explicitly to have God 'herself' as the very font of knowledge, head lecturer, curriculum advisor and chairman of the board of directors, as well as being available for consultations via "messenger" at regular intervals.
It is therefore most curious that, for such an institution, the single most important question that needs to be asked is not asked. And the related questions which consequentially need to be asked, not just once but repeatedly, are also neither asked nor examined dispassionately.
The single most important question one must ask, if one is considering studying at such a "university" that’s making such claims as the BKWSU, has to be:
What is fascinating (and I choose fascinating with full intention) about the way the BKWSU works is how it convinces people to forgo everything they have learnt in life experience - of how we should judge someone’s claim to authority - and gets people to flip that on its head, and change the definition to suit the claim.
It is therefore most curious that, for such an institution, the single most important question that needs to be asked is not asked. And the related questions which consequentially need to be asked, not just once but repeatedly, are also neither asked nor examined dispassionately.
The single most important question one must ask, if one is considering studying at such a "university" that’s making such claims as the BKWSU, has to be:
- 1. Is this God?
- 2. If God exists, what defines "God"?
- 3.
a) Does my definition of God determine whether I accept it is or isn’t God,
or
b) Does my acceptance or rejection determine my definition
What is fascinating (and I choose fascinating with full intention) about the way the BKWSU works is how it convinces people to forgo everything they have learnt in life experience - of how we should judge someone’s claim to authority - and gets people to flip that on its head, and change the definition to suit the claim.