There is little to no mention of Shiva in the Avyakt Vanis, there was no mention of Shiva between 1930 odds and 1950 odds ... the window narrows.
jim brady wrote:A nameless BK wrote;
"All you have to do is open your heart. and allow the healing of the soul to take place."
I find the reply hugely positive, unthreatening and full of acceptance. Yet it doesn't strike a strong enough chord with me. Wild claims, inaccurate population figures, 5,000 year cycles, delayed destructions, dinosaurs etc. just don't seem to matter to BKs who are in for the long haul ... A deity who appears unwilling to dialogue with humans troubled by fundamental inconsistencies.
My impression is;
When pressed with the anomalies etc a BK goes into a state of paralysis or denial. It has become a very polished state of paralysis. But that is what you are hearing at the start of their reponse.
If one knows the organization, one can almost discern the individuals whose voice is source of those well-polished and well-practised, "acceptable" responses but, to be honest, they are not really rooted in the voice of The Knowledge. "Its your decision" ..."Truth is subjective" ... "be happy, not right" ... ah, for the sirens' call of the BKWSU.
In essence what they do is put the onus back on the external individual and exclude the holy spook, the organization, and the individuals who are the organization, of any responsibility whatsoever. The "don't think ... touchie-feelie ... shut off any discriminatory function of the intellect" line comes next. Notice that the holy spook has never ever, ever done anything wrong nor manifest any fault. Even his errors and mistakes are divinely wise. Tests and encouragement for the "children" to resolve.
Strictly speaking, from a Gyani point of view, I would strongly argue against "Yoga being the way of the heart". That is Bhakti Yoga. Raja Yoga should be the way of the soul which is above the heart. Did we now each Raja Yoga as Buddhi or Gyana Yoga? The heart feels but the intellect discriminates, what happen when the intelligent discriminates mistakes ... ? "Oh, the intellect is impure or they are edited out next Murli revision". I also thought it was not an organisation run by human beings but one run by God, so should not we have higher standards? Surely it is this God that answers our question and not our unreliable manmat ridden selves?
The is always the slight undercurrent of superiory complex ... the "bigger picture" that only they have ... and the use of shorthand which the world reads one way but the BKs mean another. "One's divinity" ... right, Golden Age status.
And lastly, of course, we have the more recent adoption of the mystical saying cherry picked second hand from some other "ancient and wise" tradition ... or a third hand via an "acceptable" Mike George book ... to give creditibility. Woo-woo the Upanishads .. or Taoism ... or the unself-realised dictator Gandhi ... when ever did they all become acceptable weapons and shields within the BK armoury? I thought they only brought degradation.
You could ask them for us to respond to a couple of issues;
In the original literature it clearly shows that Destruction was thought to be in WWII, 1950 ... and then we have the 1967 episode ... and you will both remember other predictions during the 80s, 90s, Y2K etc. Now, the potted "acceptable" response that the BK will use is to go into a dazy and say, "
Baba has never given an exact date for Destruction".
This is true to the point he has never said "5.32pm on 23rd of May 19xx" but it is UNTRUE to the point of approximate to a year type predictions. "Within a year or so" or "Within 10 years" has clearly written, which I think out of 5,000 is reasonable enough to be called 'specific'. (And we all know the Seniors that have been going 2 year, 2 years for the last 25 years ...).
My question would be, does he think that it is ethical to repeatedly put individuals under such clearly erroneous pressure AND to take money and time out of their lived under such pressures?
And does he think that it is ethical to repeatedly put
new individuals under such clearly erroneous pressure AND to take money and time out of their lived under such pressures without telling them about all the previous failed predictions which are being erased from the Murlis?
It might be good to ask them to qualify by what they mean by "bigger picture" because what we have no, presumable post Self Management Leadership Wing, is a load of gee-whizz business type hyperbole hiding the same-old same-old Krishna and the Golden Aged baubles stuff. Also, more specifically, to explain the vast change between the Sakar and Avyakt Murlis.
I think you might be wasting your time because as soon as you start trying to bringing them down to answer practical questions, they disappear off into the clouds of light. BUt what I really want to know is how and when they introduced Shiva into their theology post 1950.
Harking back to the very top of this post, "
All you have to do is open your heart and allow the healing of the soul to take place", no doubt switching off your mind in the process. That really defines things to me as "Luciferic" by which I mean expansive, romantic, illusiory, egotistical, ungrounded and unpractical. Back to that siren's call I always hear when they start going on like this.