- Posts: 1593
- Joined: 30 Apr 2006
One can define rich-poor as either rich-poor in material terms or rich-poor in moral spiritual terms.
In our modern society, I think "poor" means both. Maybe the question should be would you like to be rich in money but have no moral values, rich in money and rich in moral values, poor in money but high moral values, or poor in money with poor moral values. In that aspect where does the BKWSU aim for? Well, the Murlis do say that the poor are the best. After all they have neither money to lose and they have no moral values to lose, hence God speaks to these folks the clearest as they have everything to gain. Those who are rich in money and rich in moral values, well, they do not need God, do they ?
Anyway, here's another recent news article about Dalits overcoming the caste system: BBC News, Mass Dalit conversions in Mumbai.
Anyone know the percentage of Dalits ("untouchables") existing within the BKWSU? And of those in the "management position" of the BKWSU, how many of them are Dalits?
In the Gita, is it mentioned what the caste of Arjun?
In our modern society, I think "poor" means both. Maybe the question should be would you like to be rich in money but have no moral values, rich in money and rich in moral values, poor in money but high moral values, or poor in money with poor moral values. In that aspect where does the BKWSU aim for? Well, the Murlis do say that the poor are the best. After all they have neither money to lose and they have no moral values to lose, hence God speaks to these folks the clearest as they have everything to gain. Those who are rich in money and rich in moral values, well, they do not need God, do they ?
Anyway, here's another recent news article about Dalits overcoming the caste system: BBC News, Mass Dalit conversions in Mumbai.
Anyone know the percentage of Dalits ("untouchables") existing within the BKWSU? And of those in the "management position" of the BKWSU, how many of them are Dalits?
In the Gita, is it mentioned what the caste of Arjun?