The BKs say, quoting the Bible, "as in the beginning, so at the end". In the beginning, there was no God Shiva, there was no personal god. Does that mean in the end they will return to that realisation and there were be no God Shiva popping down from Paramdham for his holidays?
There was 24 years of no God Shiva, does that mean 24 years of no God Shiva at the end? It's stupid even to speculate and speculations are all anyone can make ... they'll chop and change, and twist and turn, make new excuses, recycle old ones ... you'll never hold them down to a single fixed answer and reliable predictions.
The only things that's reliable about spiritualism, and BKism is based on spiritualism not spirituality, is that it is unreliable.
I am also remembering Joseph de Maistre's who wrote,
Unfortunately, India is besieged by so many of these cults exploiting the vulnerable individuals greed, superstition and lack of education what can it do? Is it on its way to a secular revolution akin to The Enlightenment in Europe? Possibly ...
Here's another saying I just extrapolated,
and that applies to every nation. So the West gets its gurus just as India gets its, and each of us is attracted to whoever, honest or tricksters, can teach us what we don't know. That is the theory ... but it's only a theory. Personally, I think life is a lot more random and complex than we realise, and not predetermined at all. We try to make it simple and orderly to suit our limited minds.
De Maistre also had another good one which applies to the BKs and went,
So there was a little ripple amongst the BKs and now they are back to sleep ... BapDada came and can change his voice. Another miracle extending their credulousness meaning they can be conned even further the next time.
Next time he wont come but will have still come in some mysterious way ... just as in the beginning the spooks were alleged to have popped in and out of various Sister speaking first from here and then from there.
But we have to even reconsider that in light of the findings we have made first. If the BKs had no concept of a personal god spirit in the beginning, and not until after 1955 ... who did they believe was speaking through these Sisters, did they believe it was one spirit or deity, or many?
Or did it even happen at all, or is it just a historical revision stewed up by the creative fantasist Jagdish Chander ... recycled and embellished, as de Maistre describes, above?
There was 24 years of no God Shiva, does that mean 24 years of no God Shiva at the end? It's stupid even to speculate and speculations are all anyone can make ... they'll chop and change, and twist and turn, make new excuses, recycle old ones ... you'll never hold them down to a single fixed answer and reliable predictions.
The only things that's reliable about spiritualism, and BKism is based on spiritualism not spirituality, is that it is unreliable.
I am also remembering Joseph de Maistre's who wrote,
Joseph De Maistre wrote:"Every nation gets the government it deserves".
Unfortunately, India is besieged by so many of these cults exploiting the vulnerable individuals greed, superstition and lack of education what can it do? Is it on its way to a secular revolution akin to The Enlightenment in Europe? Possibly ...
Here's another saying I just extrapolated,
,"Every nation gets the gurus it deserves"
and that applies to every nation. So the West gets its gurus just as India gets its, and each of us is attracted to whoever, honest or tricksters, can teach us what we don't know. That is the theory ... but it's only a theory. Personally, I think life is a lot more random and complex than we realise, and not predetermined at all. We try to make it simple and orderly to suit our limited minds.
De Maistre also had another good one which applies to the BKs and went,
De Maistre wrote:False ideas (opinions) are like false money, struck first of all by guilty men and thereafter circulated by honest people who perpetuate the crime without knowing what they are doing.
So there was a little ripple amongst the BKs and now they are back to sleep ... BapDada came and can change his voice. Another miracle extending their credulousness meaning they can be conned even further the next time.
Next time he wont come but will have still come in some mysterious way ... just as in the beginning the spooks were alleged to have popped in and out of various Sister speaking first from here and then from there.
But we have to even reconsider that in light of the findings we have made first. If the BKs had no concept of a personal god spirit in the beginning, and not until after 1955 ... who did they believe was speaking through these Sisters, did they believe it was one spirit or deity, or many?
Or did it even happen at all, or is it just a historical revision stewed up by the creative fantasist Jagdish Chander ... recycled and embellished, as de Maistre describes, above?