From Moreaboutbrahmakumaris.org
The Brahma Kumaris have been known for exaggerign the professional status of their adherents for publicity purposes for decades. It's apparently still going on.
Recently an actual BKWSU Trustee has been outed for falsifying professional status ... in this case it could even constitute a crime worth of imprisonment. The claim appears to be foundation for encouraging BK followers to make financial investments.
Brahma Kumaris Australia are current facing a challenge of their dubious practises from within the following.
It does not end there though, the author reports ...
* Chennaibhai is not his real name
The Brahma Kumaris have been known for exaggerign the professional status of their adherents for publicity purposes for decades. It's apparently still going on.
Recently an actual BKWSU Trustee has been outed for falsifying professional status ... in this case it could even constitute a crime worth of imprisonment. The claim appears to be foundation for encouraging BK followers to make financial investments.
Brahma Kumaris Australia are current facing a challenge of their dubious practises from within the following.
1. Chennaibhai* claims to be a Barrister and Solicitor, and as such he is identified in the BKA Constitution. But Chennaibhai is not a Barrister, he has definitely not been called to the Bar: the NSW Bar Association is very definite on that.
2. Further, as below, apparently to impress a BK Sister who had caught his eye, Chennaibhai claimed to be have an even higher status: a Queen’s Counsel! However, as we know, Chennaibhai is just a humble Parramatta solicitor. And we wish him well in his practise…though his attempted scamming of the innocent appears to be continuing...as below…
It does not end there though, the author reports ...
A BK Sister recently wrote me in this way:‘Earlier this year Chennaibhai (ed) also asked me if any of my clients might be interested in investing. When I asked him to explain more, he was vague and even told me I just have to trust him and the process, and there is no way anyone can lose, and it requires six months wait.
If what the BK Sister experienced is true, friends, our hearts go out to her, and this is surely inappropriate behaviour by Chennaibhai and others in BK authority. is not it?
It took me a while before I wrote to S**** and told her what happened as well as him behaving sexually inappropriate towards me ... my concern was if he is a trusted member of the board, I think people need to be cautious ... I was almost nauseous, vomiting thinking about him...he boasts of being a QC.
The Sister says she wrote to BK Charlie Hogg, BKA Chair, but he did not respond: 'Charlie did not say anything’ she writes.
* Chennaibhai is not his real name