Certainly when Besant spoke of being a Brahmin, she meant a caste born Brahmin and not a BK Brahmin.
mr green wrote:Crowley was a private advisor to Churchill and many other big wigs.
Hmmn, I reckon that is urban legend of an Ickean scale ... and sort of headed well off topic. Crowley was a terrible braggart and claims to have given Churchill the V-sign, so as to speak, but there are other reports it came via the BBC. On the suggestion of Ian Fleming, the James Bond author, British Intelligence considered asking Crowley to assist the them interpreting the Occultism of Herman Hess and Nazis but it never came off. I reckon a bit of an exaggeration to say he was "a private advisor to Churchill". They probably kept tabs on him because he was seen as a proto-Nazi but, as above, London was a small place, the social elite, Masons etc, courted each other.
All the same, there are parallels between these players and it gives a bigger picture to spiritual events the early 20th Century.
Aleister Crowley (born October 1875) and Theosophist medium Alice Bailey (born June 1880) were at least peers of Lekhraj Kripalani's (born 1884), although not connected. All obtained their material in a similar manner, channelled communication incorporating elements from the medium's subconscious. Crowley's angel was named Aiwass. Alice Bailey's angel was named Djwhal Khul. Kripalani's angel ... well did not seem to know what was going on until ... when ... some date later when he names himself Shiva. Case of psychic symbiosis with an elevated entity expressing itself through their host's subconsciouses.
Like Kripalani experience, Aiwass also reportedly manifested as a voice and dictated to Crowley 'The Book of the Law'. He also heralded the coming of a new Aeon, the third great age of humanity. Crowley considered himself as the profit of that New World but lost it, in my opinion, probably due to his sex and drugs addictions.
Within the system founded by Aleister Crowley, the Holy Guardian Angel is the "Silent Self", representative of one's truest divine nature. In some branches of occultism, "Holy Guardian Angel" has become common and is considered equivalent to the Atman of Hinduism; the 'over' or 'higher self' and often experienced as a separate being, independent from the adept. In Crowley's system, the single most important goal is to consciously connect with one's Holy Guardian Angel, a process termed "Knowledge and Conversation." By doing so, the adept becomes fully aware of his own True Will.
Crowley argued that Aiwass was an objectively separate being from himself, possessing far more knowledge than he or any other human could possibly have and wrote "The Book of the Law". He said, that Aiwass was "an intelligence both alien and superior to myself, yet acquainted with my inmost secrets; and, most important point of all, that this intelligence is discarnate."
Now, frankly, wrap it all up in corporate training sessions all you like, but if you correlate all these individuals' experiences with the 'Modern Spiritualist Movement', Bengali Shaktism etc ... are the processes REALLY that different or unique? Or is it not just some "business as usual" for some Holy or Unholy Spooks that appear to live off and parallel to humanity. Was there some sort of wave of connected psychism around the world at that time?
Putting the BKWSU's Bhakti aside, it maintains one discussion we have had, and are having with BKDimok and the Vishnu Party, of whether or not the Shiva element is separate or part of the self/the medium, e.g. Shiva Baba being Lekhraj Kirpalani's higher self introducing us to our higher self. Hence, the value is knowing Lekhraj Kirpalani's pre-Gyan influences and the genuine history of the Yagya.
Crowely wrote:The existence of true religion presupposes that of some discarnate intelligence, whether we call him God or anything else. And this is exactly what no religion had ever proved scientifically. And this is what The Book of the Law does prove by internal evidence, altogether independent of any statement of mine. This proof is evidently the most important step in science that could possibly be made: for it opens up an entirely new avenue to knowledge. The immense superiority of this particular intelligence, AIWASS, to any other with which mankind has yet been in conscious communication is shown not merely by the character of the book itself, but by the fact of his comprehending perfectly the nature of the proof necessary to demonstrate the fact of his own existence and the conditions of that existence. And, further, having provided the proof required.
|
|