I have been reading the original materials and churning this issue of "God Brahma", taking on board that the title Prajapita God Brahma might have been "god" as in Dev for deity rather than Bhagwan, Paramatma or any other title for a Supreme Entity.
Of course, until the Brahma Kumaris become honest and release original materials in Hindi, there is no way of us knowing ... but what is in support of this theory is other comments made by Om Radhe that "no one can be God who is impure with vices" and claims that only Lekhraj Kirpalani was impure of vices at that time, so only he can be called God. What impression does this give us of their conception of God?
Now ... this throws up a number of issues;
a) If Lekhraj Kirpalani was NOT considered to be The God (Brahma or otherwise) but only a god or deity, a status to which any BK follower could aspire ...
No one has been able to come back and refute any of these findings nor provide references to how and when a personal God was introduced to the BKWSU.
b) If Lekhraj Kirpalani had become completely pure by 1938/39 and was in his god deity status, totally unique amongst all of humanity, why did he have to continue making efforts, why did he have to burn of karma through illness and even finally a death by heart ache?
I am attempting to unveil a truer picture of the psychology and mental atmosphere in the Om Mandli and early years of the PBIVV (BKWSU). OK, so we can easily dismiss this as whacky Hindoo bottom kissing on behalf of Lekhraj Kirpalani's gopes and gopis. The kind of bottom kissing that Jagdish Chander and Janki Kripalani institutionalised. (I am still stuck to find out who the original and English language scribe was in the 30s and 40s, when did Chander come into Gyan?).
We can surmise why Janki Kripalani institutionalised worshipping her 'Krishna' (Lekhraj Kirpalani), surely? She was still so overwrought with having left Gyan to get married, having sex, not liking it, and then running back to Lekhraj Kirpalani (NOTE: NOT Shiva Baba BECAUSE HE DID NOT EXIST THEN) ... would it be too much to suggest there was a little guilt and shame involved there especially as the Purity stakes were raised?
Now, let us start with the psychological baseline of the gopes and gopis;
So, what else can we add to this rising image of the state of mind of the Brahma Kumaris?
Now, my first point is to state the obvious ... that 20 years of mental conditioning, in an tightly enclosed "world rejecting" order of 200 people locked away from the ever changing nature of Reality, does not go away over night!!! ... any one with any sanskars, not to say personality, will know that these do not disappear easily, or at all.
But my major concern is ... who was actually saying what by way of a Murli or spiritual instructions??? What was that mental conditioning??? ... this has been removed from our vision by the leadership of the BKWSU and so it makes it much more difficult for us to distinguish and filter out the errors that were implanted into their minds and permeate through the BKWSU even now as their knowledge and powerbase ... Not just the first 20 years, which takes us up to 1942 or later but even up until the formalized 1960 Murlis that are used for the Murli cycle today. That is, 30 years of mental programming.
In essence, I suggest that what we are doing here is back-engineering the BK source code to question and remove or disable the erroneous software and, perhaps, even the erroneous programmers.
What clues we have to work on so far are;
Over to you ...
Of course, until the Brahma Kumaris become honest and release original materials in Hindi, there is no way of us knowing ... but what is in support of this theory is other comments made by Om Radhe that "no one can be God who is impure with vices" and claims that only Lekhraj Kirpalani was impure of vices at that time, so only he can be called God. What impression does this give us of their conception of God?
Now ... this throws up a number of issues;
a) If Lekhraj Kirpalani was NOT considered to be The God (Brahma or otherwise) but only a god or deity, a status to which any BK follower could aspire ...
- that means that for the first 20 years or so, the Brahma Kumaris were essentially atheists, or more accurately following what they would call the sanyasi of "worshipping" the Brahm Element.
No one has been able to come back and refute any of these findings nor provide references to how and when a personal God was introduced to the BKWSU.
b) If Lekhraj Kirpalani had become completely pure by 1938/39 and was in his god deity status, totally unique amongst all of humanity, why did he have to continue making efforts, why did he have to burn of karma through illness and even finally a death by heart ache?
- How and when the Brahma Kumaris come to realise this was not true?
Was it an incognito Shiva that led them to believe this?
Was it an incognito Shiva that spoke through Lekhraj Kirpalani to state this was so?
Why did the incognito Shiva, i.e. the Shiva that had not manifest himself yet in name or form, hide himself and allow such Bhakti of Lekhraj Kirpalani?
I am attempting to unveil a truer picture of the psychology and mental atmosphere in the Om Mandli and early years of the PBIVV (BKWSU). OK, so we can easily dismiss this as whacky Hindoo bottom kissing on behalf of Lekhraj Kirpalani's gopes and gopis. The kind of bottom kissing that Jagdish Chander and Janki Kripalani institutionalised. (I am still stuck to find out who the original and English language scribe was in the 30s and 40s, when did Chander come into Gyan?).
We can surmise why Janki Kripalani institutionalised worshipping her 'Krishna' (Lekhraj Kirpalani), surely? She was still so overwrought with having left Gyan to get married, having sex, not liking it, and then running back to Lekhraj Kirpalani (NOTE: NOT Shiva Baba BECAUSE HE DID NOT EXIST THEN) ... would it be too much to suggest there was a little guilt and shame involved there especially as the Purity stakes were raised?
Now, let us start with the psychological baseline of the gopes and gopis;
- they were mainly, young,
they were highly uneducated Vaishnavite bhagats (Krishna/Vishnu worshippers),
they were utterly dependent, mentally, physically and financially on the male figurehead in their life for daily subsistance (as we have discussed with Andrey relating to the orthodox Hindu views of women that permeate Gyan even now),
they were tripping out of their bodies, having visions, going into trances, having ghosts all over the place, performing all sorts of uncharted spiritual activities.
And let us also bear in mind that the Vedas, the scriptural and spiritual knowledgebase of Hinduism, were basically only written and taught in Sanskrit at that time (as, say, the Christian Popes only ever allowed The Bible to be written and spoken in Latin).
So, what else can we add to this rising image of the state of mind of the Brahma Kumaris?
Now, my first point is to state the obvious ... that 20 years of mental conditioning, in an tightly enclosed "world rejecting" order of 200 people locked away from the ever changing nature of Reality, does not go away over night!!! ... any one with any sanskars, not to say personality, will know that these do not disappear easily, or at all.
But my major concern is ... who was actually saying what by way of a Murli or spiritual instructions??? What was that mental conditioning??? ... this has been removed from our vision by the leadership of the BKWSU and so it makes it much more difficult for us to distinguish and filter out the errors that were implanted into their minds and permeate through the BKWSU even now as their knowledge and powerbase ... Not just the first 20 years, which takes us up to 1942 or later but even up until the formalized 1960 Murlis that are used for the Murli cycle today. That is, 30 years of mental programming.
In essence, I suggest that what we are doing here is back-engineering the BK source code to question and remove or disable the erroneous software and, perhaps, even the erroneous programmers.
What clues we have to work on so far are;
- that other mediums and trance messengers were used,
that, perhaps, Narain Shewakram was involved,
that Lekhraj Kirpalani just wrote stuff (automatic/psychic writing?) and then it was checked out by some Sister/medium (and with some spook?)
Over to you ...