shivsena wrote:Do you mean to say that self-realisation= God-realisation, i.e. self=supreme and atma=parmatma !!!!! If this is your belief, then do you see yourself as God? When you have reached relf-realisation, does every soul become God in the self-realised state? Does this mean that you believe in the omnipresence of God or multiple Gods?
Now read your quotation from your previous article of this thread (dated 20 May 2008);Just turn your head inwards and look at yourself
Are not these your quotations contradictory to each other????? When I say that I am practising self-realisation (to approch God-realisation), you criticise me that I believe in self-realisation = God-realisation & Atma = Parmatma; then.....then why do you suggest me to turn my head inside & to look myself (indirectly to practise self-realisation)? For me, self-realisation is not equal to God-realisation, but they are supportive to each other & they both go hand-in-hand; practice of one leads to another. Does not also Murli talk about self-respect (self-realisation)?It seems that you have been to various parties but you have chosen not to stick to any one party, as they probably did not fit into your thinking and you have decided to take only the points which appealed to you to form your own theory;
I am totally plain & have washed my brain. I've not developed any very 'special' frame of thinking & theory. I take only those Murli points whose unlimited (symbolic) meanings appeals to my future inner self (who is very close to God - the Ocean of Knowledge). What's wrong with me if I am not satisfied with the literal meaning of those Murli points related to 5,000 year cycle?So does it mean that you have no one to guide you in life and no religious or spiritual organisation to which you owe 100% alliance and that you are your own guru(guide) and you just rely on your inner instincts to reach self-realisation ie God-realisation.
I am practishng self-realisation - this does not mean that I am Guru (guide) of myself. I also believe that when God will be revealed, He will teach or give Shrimat face-to-face; but, presently, when I practise self-realisation (via visualising my own future inner self who is very close to God), God guides me through that my future inner-self though He is not yet revealed; thus my complete knowledgeful future self serves as an instrument for God to guide me & to derive me unlimited meanings of Murlis & scriptures.I 100% believe in the basic structure of the BK and PBK knowledge and my difference lies only in their interpretation of Murlis of Shiva.
Brother, I've no any problem & enmity with BKs & PBKs. I honestly promise you I'll definately believe in the basic structure of BKWSU, if I found the unlimited meanings of Murli points to be rational according to the guide-lines of God which I receive through my inner-self. For this, I'll deeply churn Murli points & then decide.I do not have any partial beliefs as this leads to ambiguities which prevents you from reaching God.
But this does not mean that I should unwillingly believe in the basic structure of BKWSU, though I've no sufficient sound proofs to support its rationality.