sachkhand
AUM Shanti.
I agree that this is a mistake. But not in this forum. Just read what has been written above. Firstly, my small mistake is pointed out and I am made aware of it (still I accept it), but the writer himself continues to say that he is not here with his true identity and does not expect others to do so. The writer even has justification for it. Nice rules.
Now if I had notified the members that I am the same Anamik, what great difference would it have made? It would just have created many other questions like why I have changed? Then I had to answer that I have to make a statement and therefore I have decided to come up with my true identity. Then someone would have advised me there was no need to rejoin as another member, but could have changed my nickname.
Again I had to ask, how to do it? Another important question would have been raised that I as anamik have previously written a subject "Prajapita will realise himself in 2007" (or somethign like that) and now I have given statement that "I am Prajapita". It was my planned move. Again I had to answer that nothing was planned. I had to justify myself. Even now I may be accused that I used Anamik to predict that Prajapita will be revealed, and I myself have come up as Prajapita as another member. And this was a planned move to bring weightage to my statement.
There would have been many such questions. As I have written earlier, I have rejoined as another member only because I wanted to be with true identity. And I did not inform this to members here because I thought it unnecessary to inform people over here who themselves are with false identity and that by informing it does not make any difference. But, you see point at me for what a grave mistake I have done. (namSiddu bombat)
Ridiculous. The writer points out to me why I did not inform the forum when I rejoined the forum with my true identity. [What am I in the eyes of the members of this forum? Just another imposter claiming himself to be Prajapita?] But the writer does not want to inform the world at large that The GodFather (as claimed by the so called PBKs) has rejoined the World Forum with His True identity as Virendra Dev Dixit.
If I have done a mistake by not informing, then the PBKs are doing The gravest mistake. BKs of the early Yagnya (including Om Radhe Mama) did the right thing. They had full faith in Dada Lekharaj as The GodFather and courage to declare it. They did not do it for cheap popularity. They did it because they cared for the ignorant people. Do you PBKs not care or do you think The GodFather has come only for BKs now? Please clarify your true feelings.
I have retracted the statement because I had said so. As people require proof, I thought it better if proof comes in Avyakt Vanis. It has not come. And as I had said earlier I retracted. But that does not make any difference in who I am. Why should I insist and argue with people? I have given the statement. But people need proof. I cannot provide it. That does not change my part. I know what to do, and I am doing it.
I do not think that it has brought anything positive to the Brahma Kumari movement nor has it reduced the negative elemets of the Brahma Kumaris. In fact, it has infused negativity in the Brahma Kumari movement and corrupted many Brahma Kumars and Kumaris.
Ravan too has to play his part in the drama. He is playing it. Both Ram and Ravan has to be present in this world with their respective corporeal form. Then only people can be identified as the followers of either Ram or Ravan, i.e. Ram Sampraday and Ravan Sampraday will be proved here.
"Brahma Murari Suraarchit Lingam, Nirmal Bhashit Sushobhit Lingam, Janmajadukh Vinashaka Lingam, Tat Pranamami Sadashiv Lingam ... Dev Muni Pravararchita Lingam, Kamadahan Karunakar Lingam, Ravan Darpa Nivaraka Lingam, Tat Pranamami Sadashiv Lingam ...". Meaning, "I salute You Token of SadaShiv, That Token which is served by Brahma Murari (Krishna) Deities, That Elegant Token which is of viceless speech or expressions, That Token which destroys sorrow of Birth (Life) ... I salute You Token of SadaShiv, That Token which is served excellently by Deities saint (seer), That Token which eliminates prestige (influence) of Ravan (who has power of vices such as sexual power);..." Satguru, Ramata Yogi (Wandering Yogi), is eliminating the influence of Ravan by entering in Ravan Rajya.
If you want this confirmed ask Virendra Dev Dixit, he knows it. Ravan identifies Ram and I have seen the scene of his surrender to Ram in my dream. It is drama. Bansy thinks I am a very serious person, possibly because I used the term serious instead of using important at some places (excuse me I am not well versed in English). But there is no need to be serious as Bansy thinks. It is just drama, and we are playing our respective part. Sangamyug is auspicious where we shed false ego and become soul conscious.
Thanks, Sanjeev.
arjun wrote: Omshanti. It is true that you did not write as anamik after becoming sachkhand, but it is also true that u did not inform us that you were anamik earlier. It is only after Sister bansy's post and after our requests that you accepted the above fact. Anyways, I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings. But I did not ask you or for that sake anyone else on this forum to divulge the personal details. I have already accepted on earlier occasions that Arjun is not my real name, but I do not want to reveal my real identity not because I am afraid but because I do not want to attract any special attention towards myself.
I agree that this is a mistake. But not in this forum. Just read what has been written above. Firstly, my small mistake is pointed out and I am made aware of it (still I accept it), but the writer himself continues to say that he is not here with his true identity and does not expect others to do so. The writer even has justification for it. Nice rules.
Now if I had notified the members that I am the same Anamik, what great difference would it have made? It would just have created many other questions like why I have changed? Then I had to answer that I have to make a statement and therefore I have decided to come up with my true identity. Then someone would have advised me there was no need to rejoin as another member, but could have changed my nickname.
Again I had to ask, how to do it? Another important question would have been raised that I as anamik have previously written a subject "Prajapita will realise himself in 2007" (or somethign like that) and now I have given statement that "I am Prajapita". It was my planned move. Again I had to answer that nothing was planned. I had to justify myself. Even now I may be accused that I used Anamik to predict that Prajapita will be revealed, and I myself have come up as Prajapita as another member. And this was a planned move to bring weightage to my statement.
There would have been many such questions. As I have written earlier, I have rejoined as another member only because I wanted to be with true identity. And I did not inform this to members here because I thought it unnecessary to inform people over here who themselves are with false identity and that by informing it does not make any difference. But, you see point at me for what a grave mistake I have done. (namSiddu bombat)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
sachkhand wrote:There is time to know The Leader of Pandavas. If anyone has any doubt, absolutely anything, he/she must get his/her doubt cleared. PBKs claim that Veerendra Dev Dixit is The GodFather or Pandavpati. Saying is different. I challenge all PBKs including Arjun of this forum. If you have absolutely no doubt about Veerendra Dev Dixit being The GodFather, then declare it to the world.
arjun wrote: If you have time you should go through similar letters written by BKs of the early Yagya (including Om Radhe Mama) to world leaders and also its results.
Ridiculous. The writer points out to me why I did not inform the forum when I rejoined the forum with my true identity. [What am I in the eyes of the members of this forum? Just another imposter claiming himself to be Prajapita?] But the writer does not want to inform the world at large that The GodFather (as claimed by the so called PBKs) has rejoined the World Forum with His True identity as Virendra Dev Dixit.
If I have done a mistake by not informing, then the PBKs are doing The gravest mistake. BKs of the early Yagnya (including Om Radhe Mama) did the right thing. They had full faith in Dada Lekharaj as The GodFather and courage to declare it. They did not do it for cheap popularity. They did it because they cared for the ignorant people. Do you PBKs not care or do you think The GodFather has come only for BKs now? Please clarify your true feelings.
arjun wrote: And you also know the result of your own declaration of being Prajapita on this forum and then retracting your statement.
I have retracted the statement because I had said so. As people require proof, I thought it better if proof comes in Avyakt Vanis. It has not come. And as I had said earlier I retracted. But that does not make any difference in who I am. Why should I insist and argue with people? I have given the statement. But people need proof. I cannot provide it. That does not change my part. I know what to do, and I am doing it.
ex-l wrote:It all hinges on the question of who or if any other soul is using his body; so-called Shiva, Ram, Krishna, Lekhraj Kirpalani or otherwise. Whatever comes out in the end, it does not diminish the positive aspects than he has brought to the Brahma Kumari movement nor reduce the negative elements of the Brahma Kumaris that his group has proven.
I do not think that it has brought anything positive to the Brahma Kumari movement nor has it reduced the negative elemets of the Brahma Kumaris. In fact, it has infused negativity in the Brahma Kumari movement and corrupted many Brahma Kumars and Kumaris.
Ravan too has to play his part in the drama. He is playing it. Both Ram and Ravan has to be present in this world with their respective corporeal form. Then only people can be identified as the followers of either Ram or Ravan, i.e. Ram Sampraday and Ravan Sampraday will be proved here.
"Brahma Murari Suraarchit Lingam, Nirmal Bhashit Sushobhit Lingam, Janmajadukh Vinashaka Lingam, Tat Pranamami Sadashiv Lingam ... Dev Muni Pravararchita Lingam, Kamadahan Karunakar Lingam, Ravan Darpa Nivaraka Lingam, Tat Pranamami Sadashiv Lingam ...". Meaning, "I salute You Token of SadaShiv, That Token which is served by Brahma Murari (Krishna) Deities, That Elegant Token which is of viceless speech or expressions, That Token which destroys sorrow of Birth (Life) ... I salute You Token of SadaShiv, That Token which is served excellently by Deities saint (seer), That Token which eliminates prestige (influence) of Ravan (who has power of vices such as sexual power);..." Satguru, Ramata Yogi (Wandering Yogi), is eliminating the influence of Ravan by entering in Ravan Rajya.
If you want this confirmed ask Virendra Dev Dixit, he knows it. Ravan identifies Ram and I have seen the scene of his surrender to Ram in my dream. It is drama. Bansy thinks I am a very serious person, possibly because I used the term serious instead of using important at some places (excuse me I am not well versed in English). But there is no need to be serious as Bansy thinks. It is just drama, and we are playing our respective part. Sangamyug is auspicious where we shed false ego and become soul conscious.
Thanks, Sanjeev.