27 Jul 2006
Dear ruhani Brothers,
It seems like most of the suryavanshi souls have varying views on ShivBaba’s part (in Virendra Dev Dixit). I personally think that rather than being more methodical in every aspects of knowledge, it is fruitful becoming more introspective about the ‘self’. I believe these remaining years (maybe months) are granted by Baba to his beloved children so that they could prepare themselves perfectly before the end times, when our purusarth will come to a full stop.
But instead, those given precious times is spent in pondering about the things like, which soul is it who is playing ‘this part’ or saying ‘such and such’ through the Chariot? Is it Brahma, or maybe it’s Shankar or maybe Shiv. Baba has mentioned clearly through both the chariots, ‘consider it to be ShivBaba speaking. You have nothing to do with them (Brahma/Shankar).’ But we children still keep on becoming investigative about the Father’s part. That is why it is said in the Murli, there’s only one star which never moves from its place, remains unshakable and the rest circle around.
My personal experience is, when I try to understand Baba in analytic sense, using too much details of knowledge contained in the intellect, it feels like I’m experiencing a Jadwat stage. In my opinion, the correct way of understanding Baba comes with a concise perceptive; otherwise, it will be the case of those scientists who try to uncover the essence of everything, studying and researching every pores in the leaves, every cells in the body or every atoms in the particles, and eventually they end up becoming doubtful about the existence of God.
Baba often says ‘bacche, yeh toh khel bana huwa hai’ and sometimes He says, ‘yeh khel kabhi bandh nahi hona hai.’ Those powerful words of Baba automatically make a soul like a detached observer as He Himself is. So, the broad Drama, the Creator and His Creation, the equilibrium in nature and shapes and structures, the history and geography; if all these matters are left aside and just Baba’s existence is studied, it would I guess be more complicated.
But if these issues are altogether perceived by Gyan dristi, it becomes very simple to understand Baba. That maybe the reason why, along with Tri-murti course (The Father’s recogniton), four other courses are also being described with equal importance. So, if we put the whole picture (meaning, the informations) together, Baba’s role and his part will be crystal clear to great extent. Its like sometimes when we listen to the beautiful devotional songs, a ‘vairag’ over the world automatically comes and our intellect, which is so sceptical most of the time, diverts towards Baba and his love over us.
At that moment, we stop examining Him. We just feel our Baba has come for his children and we have to remember Him. I think that is the true moment when we have the recognition of the Father in our buddhi.
Om Shanti...
It seems like most of the suryavanshi souls have varying views on ShivBaba’s part (in Virendra Dev Dixit). I personally think that rather than being more methodical in every aspects of knowledge, it is fruitful becoming more introspective about the ‘self’. I believe these remaining years (maybe months) are granted by Baba to his beloved children so that they could prepare themselves perfectly before the end times, when our purusarth will come to a full stop.
But instead, those given precious times is spent in pondering about the things like, which soul is it who is playing ‘this part’ or saying ‘such and such’ through the Chariot? Is it Brahma, or maybe it’s Shankar or maybe Shiv. Baba has mentioned clearly through both the chariots, ‘consider it to be ShivBaba speaking. You have nothing to do with them (Brahma/Shankar).’ But we children still keep on becoming investigative about the Father’s part. That is why it is said in the Murli, there’s only one star which never moves from its place, remains unshakable and the rest circle around.
My personal experience is, when I try to understand Baba in analytic sense, using too much details of knowledge contained in the intellect, it feels like I’m experiencing a Jadwat stage. In my opinion, the correct way of understanding Baba comes with a concise perceptive; otherwise, it will be the case of those scientists who try to uncover the essence of everything, studying and researching every pores in the leaves, every cells in the body or every atoms in the particles, and eventually they end up becoming doubtful about the existence of God.
Baba often says ‘bacche, yeh toh khel bana huwa hai’ and sometimes He says, ‘yeh khel kabhi bandh nahi hona hai.’ Those powerful words of Baba automatically make a soul like a detached observer as He Himself is. So, the broad Drama, the Creator and His Creation, the equilibrium in nature and shapes and structures, the history and geography; if all these matters are left aside and just Baba’s existence is studied, it would I guess be more complicated.
But if these issues are altogether perceived by Gyan dristi, it becomes very simple to understand Baba. That maybe the reason why, along with Tri-murti course (The Father’s recogniton), four other courses are also being described with equal importance. So, if we put the whole picture (meaning, the informations) together, Baba’s role and his part will be crystal clear to great extent. Its like sometimes when we listen to the beautiful devotional songs, a ‘vairag’ over the world automatically comes and our intellect, which is so sceptical most of the time, diverts towards Baba and his love over us.
At that moment, we stop examining Him. We just feel our Baba has come for his children and we have to remember Him. I think that is the true moment when we have the recognition of the Father in our buddhi.
Om Shanti...
The other option is that the understanding has been changed through BK tampering of Murlis