Suryavanshi wrote:Baba has said in the discussions that we children don't have to think whether the soul of Ram or Soul of Krishna is speaking through this Chariot. We have to think that whatever is spoken one should think that ShivBaba is speaking. He is responsible for whatever is spoken by soul of Ram or by soul of Krishna through this Chariot. So, please clarify is it correct to distinguish as if who is speaking ?
Dear Suryavanshi,
Omshanti. And welcome to the forum.
I agree with what you have written in the first paragraph above. Although we should not distinguish as to who is speaking, but sometimes it is apparent that who is speaking. Mostly they are such sentences which are related to the personal lives of the souls of Ram or Krishna (in their Confluence-Aged bodies of Baba Virendra Dev Dixit and Lekhraj Kirpalani respectively). But in spite of Baba's Shrimat as written by you above, if you feel that any particular sentence seems to be the direction of the soul of Ram or Krishna, you can always approach Baba directly and get a clarification.
For example, with regard to purchase of property/house, both kinds of directions (yes & no) are available in the Murlis narrated through Lekhraj Kirpalani, so, it is better to seek clarification from the present part of ShivBaba before taking any such step.
new_knowledge wrote:Dear Brother, PBKs believe that Krishna is Baby-Budhi (childish-intellect). So Baba has to enter in the body of Ram to clarify Murlis. Then how Krishna's (Lekhraj Brahma's) words should be considered as equivalent to Shrimat?
Omshanti. The words spoken through Dada Lekhraj and published as Sakar Murlis by BKs were spoken by ShivBaba and not just by Dada Lekhraj. Even if the soul of Lekhraj Kirpalani spoke a few words in between, the children were directed to consider those words also to be Shrimat. So, there is nothing wrong in considering the words spoken through Dada Lekhraj as Shrimat.
Regards,
OGS,
Arjun