new_world, who is now new_knowledge wrote:In Advance Literature, the meaning of 'swarg ke rachieta' (in the picture of Lakshmi-Narayan) has been wrongly interpreted. PBKs clain that Lakshmi & Narayan both are creators (rachieta) of heaven (swarg) & to indicate that there are two creators of heaven (Lakshmi & Narayan), the term 'swarg ke rachieta' is used. Here 'ke' indicates that there are more than one creators. If there is only one creator (ShivBaba), the word 'ka' may be used. So the word 'ke' indicates that Lakshmi-Narayan (who are two in number) are creators of heaven & not ShivBaba (who is one in number). This is PBK thinking. But in Hindi, the word 'ke' may also imdicate a single person to give respect. For example, 'Veerendra Dev Dixit Advance Party ke rachieta hai'. If I say, 'Veerendra Dev Dixit Advance Party ka rachieta hai', then that would be bad manners. That would be insult of the great personality Baba Veerendra Dev Dixit. So here 'ke' is used even though the the creator of Advance Party is one in number.
Thus the word 'ke' does not definitely prove that there are two creators & not one. So it may be possible that use of 'ke' may be used to give respect to ShivBaba. I am not trying to prove that ShivBaba (and not Lakshmi-Narayan) is the creator of heaven. But ... but the word 'ke' does not prove that creators of heaven are more than one.
Dear Brother,
Omshanti. The view that you have expressed about the inference of the word 'ke' in the picture of Lakshmi Narayan is same as the view of BKs. The PBK view of the same was given by ShivBaba through Baba Virendra Dev Dixit as part of the Advanced Knowledge. The word 'ke' in Hindi denotes 'singular with respect' and also denotes 'plural'. The inference of 'ke' to be 'plural' was not just based on the alternative meaning in Hindi but it is also related to another word in the same sentence 'rachayitaa' which also means 'plural', with its singular form being 'rachtaa'. So, it refers to the Confluence-Aged Lakshmi and Narayan and not just the incorporeal point of light. By saying so, we are not reducing the importance of incorporeal Shiv. It is He alone who gets the task of establishment done through the Confluence-Aged Narayan, but He does it when He enters into a human body and not in the form of an incorporeal soul. There are hundreds of Murli points which say that Supreme Soul cannot do anything through just inspiration. He has to enter into a body to perform His divine tasks.
I am quoting below the relevant paragraph from the Advance Course on the picture of Lakshmi and Narayan:
"This matter is very clear in this picture. On the top of the picture also a heading is given – "Creators of heaven and their divine creation" (swarg kay rachayita aur unki daivi rachana). Here, if we look carefully then one will come to know that 'Swarga kay rachayita' (Creators of heaven) is a plural phrase. It has not been written as "Swarga ka rachayita" (Creator of heaven). If it had been written ‘Swarga ka rachayita’ (Creator of heaven) then rachayita (Creator) would have been one, but here it has been written 'Swarga ke rachayita' (Creator of heaven) because, for the process of creation of the world, two persons are required. Without two persons, creation of children cannot take place; that is why here it has been written, 'Swarga ke rachayita' (creators of heaven).
It is not that creation will take place through the point of light Shiva. Point of light Shiva is the name of incorporeal soul- Shiva. He is one. But one can get incorporeal inheritance from the incorporeal Father. Also, there is no question of creation of something incorporeal, because the incorporeal soul is without any beginning (anaadi) and is imperishable (avinashi). So there is no question of creating it. That thing is created, which did not exist earlier. So both creator and creation should be corporeal. That is why it has been written here 'Swarga ke rachayita' i.e., creator of the heaven, i.e., Lakshmi & Narayan and further it has been written, "and their divine creation".
The divine creation of the creators of heaven Lakshmi-Narayan, who have been referred to in plural. Divine creation means creation of deities. The children born to them will be deities. If they are termed as Shiva's divine creation then, Shiva is in fact God. Will God create God & Goddess or the deities? Deities create deities and God creates God & Goddess. The title of God & Goddess is that of Confluence-Aged Lakshmi & Narayan, who are transformed from man to Narayan and woman to Lakshmi, i.e., they are called Nar (man) - Narayan (Deity). The children who will be born as deities in the Golden Age will not be called God-Goddess (mu.1.12.96, pg.2), because the title of God-Goddess is for the people of all the religions. They are the parents of the entire world, whether anyone considers them their parents or not.
So the heading "Creators of heaven and their divine creation" proves the fact that the creator should be first and the creation should be next. This entire picture has been prepared in the sequence of the creators and the creation. In the picture of Lakshmi & Narayan, in the centre is the picture of Confluence-Aged Lakshmi & Narayan. When the Confluence Age will near completion, then some years before completion Radha-Krishna will be born as their children, they are their creation."
Well, you are free to have your own considered opinion.
Regards,
OGS,
Arjun