ex-l wrote:But, remember, we are not here to criticize but support and hold open discussions.
Well, that's not quite so clear ... obviously there is a lot of open criticism/critiques of the BKs on this site and we do not need to be shy about that, as well as performing a support role. It doesn't exactly sit on the fence!
I guess the question is more of making sure people understand a code of conduct with discussions and also being transparent. There seems to be a lot of groups masquerading as other groups going on, which is wierd. I do not think they realise that most people come here with a desire to be open minded, not to join another group ... Maybe they think they can start recruiting here and also get more exposure for their views.
With the PBKs it is quite clear, they think that they and the BKs are one family, they uses or recognise the same Murlis and Knowledge, they claim mediumship of the same god or spirits.
If this is the case; why are the ex BKs not as openly critical of the PBKs as they are of the BKs? and why are you so keen to defend the PBKs from attack from these other folks; are they not doing the same to the PBKs as this site is doing to the BKs, ie exposing issues?
Why is one to be automatically defended and the other automatically assumed guilty?
As you know; I do not sit on the fence on these matters, I have issues with the BK structure. I know very little about the PBKs other than what I have observed here.
I just think that if this site is to have respect as being impartial, and not being a "front" for the PBKs, we all need to be aware that all have an equal right to whinge; whether it be about the PBKs or the BKs or PPPand a Half BKs.