Do BKs believe in basic astrological personalities at all?

Scientific challenges to the beliefs promoted by the Brahma Kumaris so called "World Spiritual University"
  • Message
  • Author

jassika

  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 27 Jul 2015

Do BKs believe in basic astrological personalities at all?

Post27 Jul 2015

Why or why not?
User avatar

Pink Panther

  • Posts: 1885
  • Joined: 14 Feb 2013

Re: do BKs believe in basic astrological personalities at al

Post27 Jul 2015

Officially, astrology is considered ”impure” by the BK establishment.

I have heard Dadi Janki over many years instruct people that astrology should be treated like therapists, i.e. avoided completely. That's because, she says, ”Baba is the supreme guide” etc etc blah blah.

The logic is simple, be totally dependant on BK ideas. The BKWSU (and cults generally) instinctually operate by Orwellian concepts of controlling language and history (after all, they say Brahma Baba is everyone’s Big Brother - and he is always watching!).

The language you think in, the concepts & paradigms that make up your mindset will determine how you think hence how you behave, and to think in astrological terms (or in scientific, psychological or any other terms) is to think in ‘non-gyan’ (i.e. ignorant) terms.

Still some BKs, usually (of course) those who know something about it, do love to talk astrology. Like God, astrology (when not properly understood) can be whatever you want it to be, confirm whatever you want it to confirm.
User avatar

Mr Green

ex-BK

  • Posts: 1877
  • Joined: 07 Apr 2006

Re: Do BKs believe in basic astrological personalities at al

Post18 Jul 2016

They do not believe in astrology, they believe in a 5000 year cycle and hideous Destruction of the world leaving only the chosen ones (BKs) to live on the earth in paradise.
User avatar

ex-l

ex-BK

  • Posts: 10660
  • Joined: 07 Apr 2006

Re: Do BKs believe in basic astrological personalities at al

Post18 Jul 2016

What is notable is that at least Lekhraj Kirpalani must have had a knowledge of astrology as the Murlis are littered with astrological references, e.g. "omen of Jupiter" kind of stuff but yes, as Pink writes, it would be seen as being "body conscious" and the opposite of their practise.

To newcomers they might adopt as easy going approach, e.g. "Whatever you want to beleive ... whatever is useful to you", but to insiders, it's all just Bhakti or superstition.

In this case, the BKs - like a stopped clock that is right twice a day - may be correct. It is all largely superstition. However, I think Pink is also correct that the underlying ethos is more about controlling social and mental influences, and monopolising financial resources.

Part of the BK leaders control over adherents' thought is to protect themselves from their ignorance. The bottomline is, they are basically uneducated and hardly know anything except accounting and their cult beliefs. And, largely, they are not very good at accounting ... good at sucking money in but not in documenting how it is spent. They would not want followers going outside the cult to be given advice by others, especially others with insights that might unmask them.

Is there any validity to astrology ... does one need it or can one live without it ... should one be led, guided, limited or enslaved by it? Those are whole other questions.

One interesting footnote ... the BKs have widely falsified Lekhraj Kirpalani's date of birth making it impossible to cast his astrological chart. Like not revealing one's full name, or having a "secret" middle name, this was also a traditional supersistious habit to stop competitors etc gaining insights and magic power over one.

However, I don't think that was the motivation in the BKs/Lekhraj Kirpalani's case.

To become an astrology, or even to gain a working understanding of astrology, you would have to study and that would be seen as a competitive distraction from BKism, as well as a threatening challenge to the power structure.

If astrology is accepted as, roughly speaking, your karmic account at birth, the BKs would dismiss it as worthless because they believe their practise destroys all past karmas, and that the point of this life ... to surrender to them and do their practise in order to create the future 5,000 years (which, in the confused manner, are already inescapably predestined anyway).

As with other religions, the BKs cherrypick certain terms and ideas with "market values", and then give them a new twist to fit in with their meaning.
User avatar

Pink Panther

  • Posts: 1885
  • Joined: 14 Feb 2013

Re: Do BKs believe in basic astrological personalities at al

Post19 Jul 2016

Although the Murli is littered with references to planets and omens etc that is just to add ”glamour” and cosmic wonder to the topic.

The reason people are discouraged from seeing astrologers or any other non-medical advisors is because they may advise the person to leave BKs or do do activity outside. Imagine an astrologer reading a chart of a thirty something woman saying ”you have gone through a period of spiritual search but the next phase of your life is about children and family life. It will bring challenges but great happiness”, - a very strong trigger to the bio-clock and decision making wouldn’t you agree?

Return to Scientific questions for BKs