I think Pink means *really* down to earth ... hands on the earth or clay, feet in the mud down to earth. That's just another 'space cadet' who thinks the world is speaker to her. That's the opposite of what Pink is saying.
--
Firstly ... be ready humanbeing (and sukshmbindu), as I am going to write things, and suggest things, in a manner which will crash straight through ordinary Indian values but are not unreasonable, unhealthy or unspiritual in the bigger picture of life. After which I was also tell you what image has been arising in my mind, when I was thinking of you and your experience ... some of which I can empathise with and see parallels in my own life. I am not a guru, not a teacher, not a doctor etc ... I am just another co-traveller or human being walking alone a path which is close to yours, and it's a little difficult to "see people" through the internet, so please allow small inaccuracies.
I must say, I was also going to suggest grounding therapies akin to those Pink mentioned, right down to dance, gardening and ceramics (pottery) but I was also say and address that other great method of grounding oneself ...
sex.
Sex, dancing (and child birth) are considered to be the most grounding and having been fortunate enough to have lived in societies where women have liberty and rights and spoken to them about their experiences, one of my strongest disagreements with Brahma Kumarism (and orthodox Hinduism), is their patriarchal fear, condemnation and supression of women's sexuality.
Their supression or denial has nothing to do with spirituality, spiritual growth etc etc and is just backwards - highly cultural (a response to conservative elements) and controlling ... more of which we can discuss later. In my opinion, because of the recent history ... or let's call it "hystoria" (pun) ... they - the
Brahma Kumaris in particular - are the VERY LEAST qualified to talk about sex, its place and effects.
It strikes me you are/were a very energetic young woman. What you appear to be telling us is that you were also a very sexual young woman. There is nothing wrong or unnatural with that ... except that you were born in the wrong society to be so!
As I read your posts, I remarked on how similar your experience and representation of it was to the classic era and environment of which psycho-analysis around ... Freud and Jung and the highly patriarchal, highly sexually repressed Viennese Jewish society/Victorian society of the early 19th Century.
The whole story of you/women being diagnosed with "hysteria" and schizophrenia -
and your culturally indoctrinated responses to your sexual feelings - is almost word for word out of that age of history.
Women back then were also being hospitalised in the West when all they really needed was to be loved physically; held (affection), penetrated, and good orgasms.
I will admit I don't know how much British Victorian influences in this area still have upon your class in India (
I am a little out of date now but I know all ages of history/humanity still exist together in India at the same time), but I can say categorically how much at first Islamic and then British Victorian/Protestant sentiments complicated India's attitude towards sex and sexuality from a historical point of view ...
on top of it's own past ... to *really* screw it up.
And it's a long way from being unentangled. Indeed, it may only be in the last decade that the discussion to unentangle it has started (and, no human being, the West is not perfect or not problematic either ... but it has different problems which are also contaminating India).
It may have just been that you were very sexual, as in had a strong libido (which does not need to be only expressed in sex) but due to your gender and culture - living in India - it went off like a rocket and exploded in on itself.
If you had been born in the West, probably you would have just gone off and had lots of fun for a few years (sex, love and relationships) and then gotten over it, then carried on life as normal. Found yourself and moved on. It's what people do, and it does not kill them either physically or spiritually. All *quasi-spirituality* like BKism does - quasi means "apparently but not really" - is bottles it up until it becomes explosive, or kills (chokes to death) that part of you.
And it makes people sick.
There are a lot of very sick and choked Brahma Kumaris.
Anyway, we can come back to explore that element later if it interests and resonated with you. There's a movie I'd like to recommend to you ...
A Dangerous Method - and it's only a movie, a conversation starter and not enlightenment ... although it is based on the real lives of Freud and Jung, and a similar young woman treated for "hysteria".
I'd be interested in your response to it.
What I was seeing in my mind was how we grow up. When we are conceived, we develop entirely within our mother's body. As we grow up, we develop almost entirely - unless there is some trauma - within our mother's and then our family's "aura" ... see it like an invisible, protective egg shell around you.
Once we get to a certain age, we start to develop our own aura/egg shell (the image of an egg shaped aura is *not* unique or original to the BKs) venture outside of our mother's/family's aura, returning to it when we feel the need for comfort and to help understand our experiences. Eventually, in most cases and to various extents, we separate and go our own way. That is a description of a near universal experience. It's a spiritualistic view of what some psychologist call "attachment theory" and which others are apply to cultic experiences.
Our success in the world in dependent on how well prepared our "egg shell", and the stuff inside it, is. Some have strong shells, others weak sheel, others broken or damaged shells ... almost none of us are 'perfectly cooked' inside. Traumas, rejections, over attachments and premature ejections from the family can have damaging effects some of which some people never recover from.
And so, the parts of your life and experience I would be most interested in are your foundations, the early part of your life (you say you were "well loved" and happy, were you over protected?) and the period of your first ejection or separation from your family, e.g. when you first went to live in the girls hostel or with this BK crone.
Perhaps you might discuss them?
The first separation is a classic example or period during which cult recruitment happens. Many cults target individuals at that age or experience.
Yes, I am not surprised, that having a strong libido - let's worth with that possibility/theory - and not being able to express it, that you were able to channel it to have strong "experiences of Baba" ... whether Baba is a real spirit being, or a psychic construction of the BKs. It does not matter which. I would say *both* are going on.
The other element though, that we cannot dismiss, is your own wish fulfilment or projection. That is not to say that *all* of your/religious experience was projection ... I would disagree with that view ... but we would have to accept to starting with 3 possibilities; projection, separate spirit being/s, and the group psychic construction (or egregore) and work out which was which.
Then, to that equation, we have to add ... or rather *remove* ... the BK/religious encouragement of 'confirmational bias'. That tendency you were expressing when you were sure your intuitions and what appeared in the Murlis had some kind of supernatural significance. That is very common not only within BKism, not only within other religions but also in borderline personality disorders.
I am absolutely sure that when you wrote that there was nothing wrong with when you were hospitalised the second (?) time, it was true. The problem was likely to be as much as with your family. This is also common ... the healthy one within the family is the one that is "punished" by the family/medical services for breaking out or rejecting the family illness.
Now, you have written that there were faults in the design of your family's "egg" or that one healer saw this as being "genetic" ... perhaps tendencies to sensitivity have been passed down (genetically), or perhaps it has just been mentally passed down (mimetically). It really doesn't matter which as they would both account to the same end effect. As children, especially I would say as a daughter to mother, we pick up and tune ourselves to issues and mental conditions ... *even* if they are not spoken about.
I've seen terrible cases of perfectly mentally healthy daughters negatively effected by their mother's mental illness, so much so that it ought to be considered a crime.
I am not suggesting that in your case necessarily - although you mention a previous serious trauma/tendencies within the family - but I would include experiences of sex and sexuality being passed on within that equation.
For example, in some cases the mother's fears, the mother's negative experiences ... whatever ... are passed on down to the daughters in a damaging way whereas a mother or a female society have healthy positive experiences passes down different images and responses.
I think a lot of that has happened within Brahma Kumarism ... which we have analysed on this forum ... which is another reason why I don't think they and their unresolved experiences would be very helpful for you and your growth and experiences. I think you're very largely on your own to work things out yourself and would not fit in or be healthy stuck within their box.