Hmm, the standard of the writing from Thinka shows that s/he is not a Thinker.
Most people I know who speak English as a second language take extra care in constructing sentences.
Looks like the ADHD, short attention span, text-speak generation has found its religion.
Sorry if this sounds personal or presumptuous. I only have a first impression from your post to go on.
u camed out of brahmakumaris because of u cant get something what u asked for right
This is not completely wrong.
What we ask for and expect from an organisation that makes the ”divine” claims that the BKs do is:
moral rectitude
philosophical rigour and integrity
honesty
prioritising truth over dogma, reputation and convention
consistency
What we don’t ask for or expect is:
false claims,
hypocrisy
denial of facts
equivocation
nepotism
negative discrimination based on caste, colour, wealth,
exploitation & waste of sincere believers’ time, energy and money
abuse of trust
aggregation of wealth to the top
activity ‘outside' basic societal morals and laws
prioritising dogma, reputation and convention over truth
inconsistency
All people, organisations - whether religious or corporate etc - experience troubles, failures, make errors, hurt clients at some stage in their activities (to varying degrees). It is how they deal with them, what they do about it at the time that matters.
The BKs live in a parallel universe. They are a closed society. They prioritise "saving face” and perpetuating their preferred public image over doing what is right and just. If this public image is in conflict with doing what is right, moral, lawful, they will do their best to maintain that image.
This has found the BKs not cooperating in best faith with police (i.e. society), not reporting crimes or withholding information, including child abuse, theft, graft, even murder, turning a blind eye to what’s happening, even it it’s helping the criminals abscond. They then plead how the criminals were not really BKs, it was the BKs who were taken advantage of etc ...
It is all meant to be kept ”in the family”. This is low level morality - loyalty to a limited group rather than to truth itself, justice itself, to society and the world as whole - which requires each of us to do to (or for) others as we would have them do to us, or for us. Including filthy shudras, agyanis, lokiks.
If you expect agyanis, etc to be honest, report crimes and criminals, cooperate with law officers etc to protect society for your sake, you expect the BKs to do the same for everyone’s sake.
That’s the legal side. On the moral side, they waste so much of the money, time and energy that their devotees give.(That's another whole chapter).
They make claims using words like ”Supreme, Highest Authority, Godly Gyan, Shrimat, Truth” - which any person who knows what these words mean would assume there’d be no major changes as to who or what is ”Supreme, Highest Authority, Godly Gyan, Shrimat, Truth” . But all of these have changed. ”No, what was said to be Highest Truth, Supreme knowledge was actually not. What I tell you now is Supreme, Highest Godly Gyan, Shrimat, Truth”. Hmmm ...
We expect any organisation or government to rectify wrongs, admit to past mistakes or failures ... and so on, so there can be reform and improvements, so that good will, trust and good faith are re-established. It’s the the ability to move forward constructively, not just making demands for unquestioning loyalty until things fade from memory so "past has passed” and history is rewritten to the point that newcomers question whether what they heard about actually happened. The BKs have a real problem with this.
We expect organisations to place the welfare of all people, their staff, their clients, the general public, above everything, including money and reputation, because it is people that are real, the other two are fleeting abstractions.
In small matters, anyone can be kind and do the right thing. It happens all the time, every day. Time and again, in important matters however, when the Shiva hits the fan, it's the people that come off second best. Dogma, money and reputation is what is held on to. Any adverse effects are ”karma drama” or ”Baba takes responsibility” which means ”nobody" is held accountable. Spirituality is redefined by the BKs as accepting the lot within the BKs, accepting another’s definition of right and wrong, i.e. handing over one’s brain at the door and towing the party line.
In terms of treatment, the BKs were OK to me personally. I had a few minor issues, but cannot really say I was directly done much harm by them, maybe because of my nature. But I saw many wrongs, or ”shouldn’t have happeneds" done to others - with unsatisfactory responses when assertive people like myself took a stand or questioned them.
Add to that a growing demand for cognitive dissonance to continually suspend disbelief just to stay with the story as the ”implausibles" mounted up ...
So Thinka, the BKs make you feel good? Is that enough reason to accept all they say and do, and the way it is done?