In defence of Aham, it's not just "jargon", it's science and if he is an engineer, then it will obviously interest him. Whatever awakens individuals' critical minds is OK by me.
aham brahmashmi wrote:When I saw the video of Janki Dadi kissing BapDada, one Dadi explained that in early days when Brahma Baba asked "kismiss" in terms of "miss, how many kiss will you give me?". I completely believed there is no god there.
One term of the brahmakumari which gives me lots of stress is "Identical cycle" ...
Kismiss is a kind of raisin or dried fruit, yes? So it was one of the little puns, a play with words, that he used instead anything of great depth or meaning?
What makes that more interesting is our discovery that in the early days, Lekhraj Kirpalani did kiss, caress, bathe, lie around with in bed and perhaps even more with the girls ... but that Janki was not part of that inner circle. It was retain for the more attractive girls.
You won't know this, Aham, but we discovered the BKs had fictionalised their history and there was no god Shiva mentioned until after 1955. From about 1932 to 1955, Lekhraj Kirpalani was their god, their Krishna, their lover.
Therefore, I would argue, Janki's kisses or desire to kiss Lekhraj Kirpalani is even more literal than you might imagine. Her devotion within BKism appears to based on her infatuation with the Lekhraj Kirpalani who rescued her from an unhappy marriage in which her infant child died. She has a complex and unresolved psychology I would say.
As far as science goes, or even logic, the BKs' so called "University" has, of course, no answers whatsoever for its discoveries science, no other alternative theories and it completely illogical.
Their university only teaches Universal Stupidity, dumbing minds down and brainwashing them into an unquestioning state, and yet they claim it is the highest, "unlimited" university and all other universities are just limited and degraded ...
Spooky Action, or spukhafte Fernwirkung in the original German, was Einstein's cheeky response to a theory he did not believe in, but he was proven wrong I understand. I am not a scientist, nor a mathematician, and so I do not understand it at all ... but basic logic and principles like entropy I can.
Despite spending millions of pounds and 70 years pushing their half-baked derivative ideas, the BKs have no come up with a single explanation how the entire Universe can return to its original state. We can calculate the amount of physical energy that might take ... where does it come from?
Often individuals here have question how they can claim that light travels backwards, e.g. light from stars more than 5,000 light years away. If you speak to a BK, they cannot even logically grasp how impossible an idea it is.
Or even something simple, like each Kalpa, satellites and space probes are sent out to Jupiter and beyond ... how will they come back to earth and the metals be separated and buried again for them to be in the same place next Cycle.
BKism is based on the acceptance of blind faith, an incredible stupidity and an amazingly conceitedness sense of self-importance ... starting with their guru, Lekhraj Kirpalani, the man who believed he was not just the gods, Krishna, Vishnu and Narayan, but even "greater than god".
How can you follow a man like that?
They are also long past their predictions for the End of the World and the creation period of a high tech, nuclear powdered, heaven on earth which is supposed to be ready by 2036.
03 Feb 2015
. 
