mbbhat wrote:3) Shiva started taking REGULAR service of Brahma Baba’s body after 1947 or 1950 when real Sakar Murlis started. That is why in Murli, Baba might have said, “I enter in this at his vanaprastha avastha (60 years)”.
Since BKs had the thinking of Shiva entered Brahma in 1937, and might had already announced to the world that GOD ENTERED IN Brahma IN 1937. Now, when they heard bhagavanuvaach that at 60th year God entered in Brahma, it would have been a big problem to Senior BKs. So, they might have altered the date of birth of Dada Lekhraj.
"Since" ... ? Since when did "BKs had the thinking of Shiva entered Brahma in 1937", mbbhat?
I sorry, I have to stop you there on that. All the time you are lacing your posts with inaccuracies and suppositions you cannot sustain and which contradict the slim evidence we do have. Instead of greasing the BK propaganda, why not just stop, go back to you sources and get ACTUAL facts? Not your suppositions. It might work on impressed neophytes, it is not going to wash here.
From Om Radhe's book (probably written with Lekhraj Kirpalani legal advocate of the time), we have a pretty sure date as of 4 th July 1938 that Lekhraj Khubchand Kripalani was 54, so he was 60 in 1944. From the Yugya posters and we have specific dates for the early Trees and Cycles that the BKWSU claim to have buried, cut out of their history and falsified in autobiographies to 1949. By 1949, they were still publishing "of which Divine Father Prajapati God Brahma, Corporeal Re-incarnation of Incorporeal God Vishnu (Chaturbhui) is the SEED". And he retired in 1932.
And no, sorry, I do not accept "forgetfulness" on behalf of the leadership. Can you see HOW loose the BKWSU version is ... how can you base facts on that. Has BOTH the "60 years" and "vanaprastha avastha" been given? Or has the 'assumption' that vanaprastha avastha equals 60 been made by BK followers? One could interpret 'vanaprastha avastha' metaphorically in a couple of manners ... but I want to know the truth not individual's interpretations.
This poster is from 1949, click to enlarge or find large version in the Library. Have you seen The Tree of the same time? Were all the Om Mandli followers as dumb as you claim? I do not think so.