One question because I do not know the answer. How much and to what extent was mediumship practised in the BKWSU during the lifetime of Lekhraj Kirpalani?
We know that there was some but how much? I was answering a question in another thread about yogi path versus mediumship when a question came up in my mind. How much "mediumship" did Lekhraj Kirpalani actually practised?
We know in the beginning the girls and women did it. We know that during his life they continued ... including (allegedly) meeting other Lekhraj Kirpalani in the Subtle Regions. We know that after his death, they have continued to practise mediumship. We know that a certain proportion of the Murlis were from his mind. We know that he and the BKs could not tell there was any Shiva at all for the first 20 years or so. We were all told that they could not tell the rest of the time ... did he do it at all?
Were his Murlis actually mediumship or channeling ... or just free association, stream of consciousness stuff on the basis of what had arisen via the mediumship sessions?
It makes me wonder. The best cover we get is that he "spoke in rememberance" and every thing he said was "accurate" but, of course, was not true. One for the historians to answer.
We know that there was some but how much? I was answering a question in another thread about yogi path versus mediumship when a question came up in my mind. How much "mediumship" did Lekhraj Kirpalani actually practised?
We know in the beginning the girls and women did it. We know that during his life they continued ... including (allegedly) meeting other Lekhraj Kirpalani in the Subtle Regions. We know that after his death, they have continued to practise mediumship. We know that a certain proportion of the Murlis were from his mind. We know that he and the BKs could not tell there was any Shiva at all for the first 20 years or so. We were all told that they could not tell the rest of the time ... did he do it at all?
Were his Murlis actually mediumship or channeling ... or just free association, stream of consciousness stuff on the basis of what had arisen via the mediumship sessions?
It makes me wonder. The best cover we get is that he "spoke in rememberance" and every thing he said was "accurate" but, of course, was not true. One for the historians to answer.