clearofBK wrote:That's quite disingenuous!
Not really. They specifically state it in their legal documents, e.g. "the BKWSO has no members", so who are BKs?
The BK leaders lead the BK followers on to believe they are one of them, but they are not really.
It's another one of their ambiguities I think should be clarified, e.g. every BK should be a shareholder or a stakeholder of the BKWSU and have rights, or shared ownership.
The way it is now, you could pour your life into building up the BKWSU for 10, 20 years, and then some center-in-charge could come along and check you and there is nothing you could do, no compensation, no security.
Some have. Almost all level with nothing.
The BKs use their followers as a servants, managers, even front line defence but at the end of the day ... you are no one and nothing to them.
True or false?
I've argued this with Karuna Shetty once (or whoever answers his email). In his opinion the owners of the BKWSU are the "Original Jewels" ... who or what does that mean? How or when do you become an "Original Jewel"?
It's not written down and systematised, is it? It's all down to the Kirpalani Klan's whim.