Since we were ape-like, and all through human history, most of us have lived in tribal extended families. A group size manipulated to remain at a workable size, e.g. when it became too big, it would be split.
Prohibiting nature expansion through procreation, but yet incurring perpetual and even growing financial demands, the BK tribal creed and system has evolved to be parasitical on other procreative tribes.
It is like those tribes in the past, all over the world from early Judaism to "Darkest Africa" that went on kidnapping and raping sprees to enlarge themselves. Indeed, even to this day there are jatis in India whose marriage rituals are memorials of this, females being kidnapped from other families and then married.
How different is this from what the Brahma Kumaris do? And, if one accepts the BK philosophy, are such ritual and happenings not a "memorial" of what happened in the last Confluence Age? (That is what the BK philosophy states).
In India, men, women and children are all kidnapped for marriage. "Stockholm Syndrome" takes this history and explains why history has designed us to quickly re-adopt to our kidnapping tribe as a survival strategy.*
The difference between "normal" families and partnerships, and those including where one member is being indoctrinated by the Brahma Kumaris into paying tax and offering free labor to them, is the fanatical, all demanding nature of Brahma Kumarism and the fact that it has both living god they can go and meet in India and a compressed value of time due to their End of the World/Destruction paradigm.
I could imagine that one non-religious partner might be very proud of their religious partner *if* they spend all their time doing genuinely charitable acts for others, or even actions which embetter society as a whole, e.g. in the arts or community ... but the BKs basically don't. Most of the time and money which is not spent on acquiring real estate is spent on self-advertising and recruiting new "slaves" and "tax payers" for the bottom of their pyramid structure.
The time, money and energy which the BK partner should be investing into their own family and tribe is leeched off into BKism ... and we have documented many cases of; mostly vulnerable women (read stupid) encourage to throw money at BK center-in-charges and spending all their time at the centre instead of at time.
Within BKism, you also have this exaggerate 'us' and 'them' mentality most other religions are relaxing; we are pure, the world is impure, we are Brahmins, they are shudras ... and the great fear of physical contact.
Of course, BKism "kidnaps" subtly (mentally) ... or as they would say, in a "royal" manner ... but the result is the end. The surviving partner is then left living with their partner who them become a BK zombie ... the 'walking dead' (literally in BKism, it is said to "die alive".
Funnily enough, this is one aspect that even the PBKs criticise the BKs over and say they are practising the religion wrongly according to the Murli teachings.
(* According to the theory of Stockholm Syndrome, those who re-adopted to the kidnapping tribe survived, those who fought and struggles against their kidnapping tribe were killed and, hence, did not pass their genes down. Therefore, the theory is our genes developed to be adoptive and non-critical towards our kidnappers).
Prohibiting nature expansion through procreation, but yet incurring perpetual and even growing financial demands, the BK tribal creed and system has evolved to be parasitical on other procreative tribes.
It is like those tribes in the past, all over the world from early Judaism to "Darkest Africa" that went on kidnapping and raping sprees to enlarge themselves. Indeed, even to this day there are jatis in India whose marriage rituals are memorials of this, females being kidnapped from other families and then married.
How different is this from what the Brahma Kumaris do? And, if one accepts the BK philosophy, are such ritual and happenings not a "memorial" of what happened in the last Confluence Age? (That is what the BK philosophy states).
In India, men, women and children are all kidnapped for marriage. "Stockholm Syndrome" takes this history and explains why history has designed us to quickly re-adopt to our kidnapping tribe as a survival strategy.*
The difference between "normal" families and partnerships, and those including where one member is being indoctrinated by the Brahma Kumaris into paying tax and offering free labor to them, is the fanatical, all demanding nature of Brahma Kumarism and the fact that it has both living god they can go and meet in India and a compressed value of time due to their End of the World/Destruction paradigm.
I could imagine that one non-religious partner might be very proud of their religious partner *if* they spend all their time doing genuinely charitable acts for others, or even actions which embetter society as a whole, e.g. in the arts or community ... but the BKs basically don't. Most of the time and money which is not spent on acquiring real estate is spent on self-advertising and recruiting new "slaves" and "tax payers" for the bottom of their pyramid structure.
The time, money and energy which the BK partner should be investing into their own family and tribe is leeched off into BKism ... and we have documented many cases of; mostly vulnerable women (read stupid) encourage to throw money at BK center-in-charges and spending all their time at the centre instead of at time.
Within BKism, you also have this exaggerate 'us' and 'them' mentality most other religions are relaxing; we are pure, the world is impure, we are Brahmins, they are shudras ... and the great fear of physical contact.
Of course, BKism "kidnaps" subtly (mentally) ... or as they would say, in a "royal" manner ... but the result is the end. The surviving partner is then left living with their partner who them become a BK zombie ... the 'walking dead' (literally in BKism, it is said to "die alive".
Funnily enough, this is one aspect that even the PBKs criticise the BKs over and say they are practising the religion wrongly according to the Murli teachings.
(* According to the theory of Stockholm Syndrome, those who re-adopted to the kidnapping tribe survived, those who fought and struggles against their kidnapping tribe were killed and, hence, did not pass their genes down. Therefore, the theory is our genes developed to be adoptive and non-critical towards our kidnappers).