- Posts: 192
- Joined: 11 May 2012
to littleo, dany wrote:Your replies in this forum confused me. I do understand your situation and the struggle you are going through to find a new life after BK "drastic experience".
I am sorry but I have to ask again if you, Littleo ... are you the same user Andre and have come back again (because you have a very similar style to his)?
If so, Littleo/Andre's story is a little different.
ex-l wrote:Are you here merely to defend the BKs with your opinions (manmat), add to our understanding or are you trying to get BKism out of your head?
littleo wrote:To defend.
Why would one defend where one had a "drastic experience"? Either something is not right here, or you appear to be a little unsure of which path in life you want to take.
What do you mean by "not there anymore" ... are you in or out of the BKWSU or AIVV? Do you want out or back in?
To be honest ... if anyone is going to defend the BKs and the BKWSU here they are going to have to use very, very good arguments and high standard of logic etc to do so; and their arguments are going to have to be congruent with the BK philosophy.
The philosophy of the BKs and their god spirits is so highly critical of other religions, philosophy and simple disciplines such as logic ... that they have no ground to them lean on those other paths, or the "old, impure world", to use them as an excuse.
littleo wrote:This is exactly the critic that how can one use manipulation and deceiving in achieveing a noble aim. I think that as long as the world is such that manipulation and deceiving have to be used, these have to be used. If they stop using these, the world will be finished.
You cannot come on and basically say, "It's perfectly OK for the BKs to be corrupt, 'manipulate and deceive' if it is useful for them because the rest of the world does it too". What a terrible idea.
Of course, if you are Andre, and you are still a PBK, it's understandable why you might half-heartedly defend the BKs ... it's over to you now.