- Posts: 52
- Joined: 26 Apr 2011
There are some interesting links between the BKs and other secret organisations.
Concerning Lekraj. The story presented of the founder suggests that during his time as a diamond merchent in India he sold jewels to high ranking people in Indian society and the British Raj. This includes the then Viscount of India.
Even a casual investigation of the Raj and India at this time informs us that the practice of Freemasonary was a virtual epidemic among dignitaries icluding military officers, civil servents, members of government, bankers, financiers, businessmen, merchents, artist, writers and so on. This would have certainly been true of the individuals that lekraj associated with in his business dealings. At this time secret societies and escoteric groups were numerous. Many of the higher echelons of secret orders like Freemasonary (ideas often not shared with masons lower down in the ranks) have the aim of creating a one-world order - a kind of Utopia for elite individuals in which they rule due to their 'enlightened' understandings and superiority to the masses.
This real agenda is in contrast to the benign and charitable face Christian based masonary groups have presented over the last couple of centuries. Perhaps we can see at this point some of the first hints at similarities between the teachings of Lekhraj Kirpalani and the secret societies and the ideas they imported from Europe during those times. In fact, to credit European masonic groups as originators of these ideas is not strictly true, similar ideas existed in the escoteric beliefs of the elites in the Indian sub-continent and China for many centuries. The great' All seeing Eye' has cast its gaze very far indeed.
There are peices of a puzzle here to be understood. Firstly, the BK teachings envision an elevated, pure and perfect ruling class of the future - the absolute monarchs of the coming Golden Age. The world they envisage is unified under a strict heirarchy with the monarchs at the top of The Tree and those at the bottom end as 'happy maids and servents'. What they really are are serfs or innocent slaves who are unaware of even the concept of slavery so cannot comprehend their true position. Everyone is happy with their lot in the world of future, no-one is discontent in relation to the life they live.
This vision of the future is very consistent with that of many secret societies like Freemasonary and other escoteric orders. For centuries the vast majority of people who have governed countries and empires, from monarch to bankers, to leaders of corporations, military figures, presidents, prime ministers and beurocrats have belonged to secret orders such as Freemasons, skull and bones, Thule etc and the vison and the true goals these societies aspire for is remarkably similar to that of BK teachings. They aim for a centralized world government ruled by a small number of 'enlightend' and superor elite. A perfect form of government which has mastered social control and engineered society to a point of perfect order. The masses of people in this world will 'happily' serve their elite rulers and will accept their lot without protest.
In fact, the masses mental state will be propelled into a euphoric condition using pharmaceuticall substances which are designed to make docile, submissive and psychologically content those who serve their masters. In this world one culture will exist, one language, one mindset, one syetem. Does this vision of the present elite rulers of our globe sound similar to you? Were did Lekraj really get his ideas from and are his teachings really an echo of those ideas carried by the many Freemasonic dignitaries he did business with?
Another peice of this puzzle relates to the BKs long association with the United Nations (although this association is often exagerated). The ruling elites of our current system (governement, monarchies, bankers, leaders of corporations etc), are if you remember, mostly members of secret, escoteric and other secret political groups with a one-world vision of governance.
After the second world war, the American government smuggled Nazi war criminals out of Germany in 'operation Paperclick. You can read all about these events from verified documents. You may remeber that Hitler wanted a one-world empire achieved through conquest. These criminals were given important scientific and governmental jobs by the US. People are not generaly aware that these Nazi figures along with the US government and other elite figures wanted to set up an organisation which continued to work toward world unification.
This began as the league of nations, and eventually cystalized into the United Nations. Those elite and influentual figures have always seen the UN as the vehicle through which a world government will come into being. This is why it is New York and under the influence of the US. This is why the UN has plans to control worldwide food production, centralize governmental power, develop a world army and bring in a new system of governmence outlined in its document Agenda 21.
So what we have is the BK elites - the so called administrators, who work toward a future unified world system involved with an organisation that also strives for a one world system of government - is this an accident, an attempt to co-opt the UN into the BK agenda? Or are the BKs really just one of the many non-governmental organisations the UN is using to orchestrate social change around the world and to further its own one world agenda?
The BKs also engage is many of the tactics used by secret societies and elite groups. For example, deception. The re-writing of history to hide inconvenient facts that don't fit with the historical picture they present. Omission, that is leaving unmentioned facts and information out so that followers or outsiders remain ignorant of important truths - George Orwel once remarked 'Omission is the greatest of all lies'. I remember that elevated and cultivated art of 'concealing and revealing' so prominant in BK teeachings. This is simple omission and deception masquarading as a spiritual skills. Elitism - outsiders are not allowed into the inner sanctums of the BK,s to be given konwledge of the teachings. Non BKs are often decscribed according to that oppressive system of the Hindu caste system 'Shudras' or 'untouchables' and viewed with thinly disguised contempt.
Repetition - all the great mind control experts and propogandarists use repitition of phrases, behaviours, thoughts, words to indoctrinate others. Double-standards and hypocracy - do as I say not what I do. Many of the directors of BK centres and the organisation as a whole are often engaged in the very behaviours they entreat others to avoid. Defamation and character assasination of those who criticize or whistleblow on them. Teaching you that you are special, different from others and encouraging identification only with the group or organisation. Financial manipulation - being encouraged to sacrifice your money or a proportion of your wealth to the organisation with the incentive of earning greater status both in the organisation and in the coming future world. These tactics and many more are typical strategies employed by secret societies, mnd control techniques, indoctrination and manipulation of others.
Having researched these topics for many years, It seems likely to me that the BKs are really a front organisation for the elite globalists who are using the organisation as just another NGO to further their agenda towards one world governance. They might appear benign on the surface and I am sure most of their members are completely unaware of what the organisation really is - but there is no doubt the senior figures know about it. I want to end by saying that the topics I've pointed to have been the subject of a great deal of research and that support for these comments comes from a huge range of books, articles and original documents. I hope it has given some readers food for thought.
Just a last comment - when the British invaded India they sent agents to talk to the Brahmin caste. Their task was to learn how such a small number of elite figures were able to rule the masses of India. They were told that one of the most powerful means of acheiving this was the indoctrination of people into a religion which taught passivity, non-violence, forgiveness, karma, peace, harmony and that the happiness of the future was manufactured from their good deeds in the present. The Brahmins told them that people following such a religion were easy to control and manipulate - this was there secret of rulership.
Concerning Lekraj. The story presented of the founder suggests that during his time as a diamond merchent in India he sold jewels to high ranking people in Indian society and the British Raj. This includes the then Viscount of India.
Even a casual investigation of the Raj and India at this time informs us that the practice of Freemasonary was a virtual epidemic among dignitaries icluding military officers, civil servents, members of government, bankers, financiers, businessmen, merchents, artist, writers and so on. This would have certainly been true of the individuals that lekraj associated with in his business dealings. At this time secret societies and escoteric groups were numerous. Many of the higher echelons of secret orders like Freemasonary (ideas often not shared with masons lower down in the ranks) have the aim of creating a one-world order - a kind of Utopia for elite individuals in which they rule due to their 'enlightened' understandings and superiority to the masses.
This real agenda is in contrast to the benign and charitable face Christian based masonary groups have presented over the last couple of centuries. Perhaps we can see at this point some of the first hints at similarities between the teachings of Lekhraj Kirpalani and the secret societies and the ideas they imported from Europe during those times. In fact, to credit European masonic groups as originators of these ideas is not strictly true, similar ideas existed in the escoteric beliefs of the elites in the Indian sub-continent and China for many centuries. The great' All seeing Eye' has cast its gaze very far indeed.
There are peices of a puzzle here to be understood. Firstly, the BK teachings envision an elevated, pure and perfect ruling class of the future - the absolute monarchs of the coming Golden Age. The world they envisage is unified under a strict heirarchy with the monarchs at the top of The Tree and those at the bottom end as 'happy maids and servents'. What they really are are serfs or innocent slaves who are unaware of even the concept of slavery so cannot comprehend their true position. Everyone is happy with their lot in the world of future, no-one is discontent in relation to the life they live.
This vision of the future is very consistent with that of many secret societies like Freemasonary and other escoteric orders. For centuries the vast majority of people who have governed countries and empires, from monarch to bankers, to leaders of corporations, military figures, presidents, prime ministers and beurocrats have belonged to secret orders such as Freemasons, skull and bones, Thule etc and the vison and the true goals these societies aspire for is remarkably similar to that of BK teachings. They aim for a centralized world government ruled by a small number of 'enlightend' and superor elite. A perfect form of government which has mastered social control and engineered society to a point of perfect order. The masses of people in this world will 'happily' serve their elite rulers and will accept their lot without protest.
In fact, the masses mental state will be propelled into a euphoric condition using pharmaceuticall substances which are designed to make docile, submissive and psychologically content those who serve their masters. In this world one culture will exist, one language, one mindset, one syetem. Does this vision of the present elite rulers of our globe sound similar to you? Were did Lekraj really get his ideas from and are his teachings really an echo of those ideas carried by the many Freemasonic dignitaries he did business with?
Another peice of this puzzle relates to the BKs long association with the United Nations (although this association is often exagerated). The ruling elites of our current system (governement, monarchies, bankers, leaders of corporations etc), are if you remember, mostly members of secret, escoteric and other secret political groups with a one-world vision of governance.
After the second world war, the American government smuggled Nazi war criminals out of Germany in 'operation Paperclick. You can read all about these events from verified documents. You may remeber that Hitler wanted a one-world empire achieved through conquest. These criminals were given important scientific and governmental jobs by the US. People are not generaly aware that these Nazi figures along with the US government and other elite figures wanted to set up an organisation which continued to work toward world unification.
This began as the league of nations, and eventually cystalized into the United Nations. Those elite and influentual figures have always seen the UN as the vehicle through which a world government will come into being. This is why it is New York and under the influence of the US. This is why the UN has plans to control worldwide food production, centralize governmental power, develop a world army and bring in a new system of governmence outlined in its document Agenda 21.
So what we have is the BK elites - the so called administrators, who work toward a future unified world system involved with an organisation that also strives for a one world system of government - is this an accident, an attempt to co-opt the UN into the BK agenda? Or are the BKs really just one of the many non-governmental organisations the UN is using to orchestrate social change around the world and to further its own one world agenda?
The BKs also engage is many of the tactics used by secret societies and elite groups. For example, deception. The re-writing of history to hide inconvenient facts that don't fit with the historical picture they present. Omission, that is leaving unmentioned facts and information out so that followers or outsiders remain ignorant of important truths - George Orwel once remarked 'Omission is the greatest of all lies'. I remember that elevated and cultivated art of 'concealing and revealing' so prominant in BK teeachings. This is simple omission and deception masquarading as a spiritual skills. Elitism - outsiders are not allowed into the inner sanctums of the BK,s to be given konwledge of the teachings. Non BKs are often decscribed according to that oppressive system of the Hindu caste system 'Shudras' or 'untouchables' and viewed with thinly disguised contempt.
Repetition - all the great mind control experts and propogandarists use repitition of phrases, behaviours, thoughts, words to indoctrinate others. Double-standards and hypocracy - do as I say not what I do. Many of the directors of BK centres and the organisation as a whole are often engaged in the very behaviours they entreat others to avoid. Defamation and character assasination of those who criticize or whistleblow on them. Teaching you that you are special, different from others and encouraging identification only with the group or organisation. Financial manipulation - being encouraged to sacrifice your money or a proportion of your wealth to the organisation with the incentive of earning greater status both in the organisation and in the coming future world. These tactics and many more are typical strategies employed by secret societies, mnd control techniques, indoctrination and manipulation of others.
Having researched these topics for many years, It seems likely to me that the BKs are really a front organisation for the elite globalists who are using the organisation as just another NGO to further their agenda towards one world governance. They might appear benign on the surface and I am sure most of their members are completely unaware of what the organisation really is - but there is no doubt the senior figures know about it. I want to end by saying that the topics I've pointed to have been the subject of a great deal of research and that support for these comments comes from a huge range of books, articles and original documents. I hope it has given some readers food for thought.
Just a last comment - when the British invaded India they sent agents to talk to the Brahmin caste. Their task was to learn how such a small number of elite figures were able to rule the masses of India. They were told that one of the most powerful means of acheiving this was the indoctrination of people into a religion which taught passivity, non-violence, forgiveness, karma, peace, harmony and that the happiness of the future was manufactured from their good deeds in the present. The Brahmins told them that people following such a religion were easy to control and manipulate - this was there secret of rulership.